Showing posts with label logos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label logos. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 7, 2019

Martin Luther – A Clever Leader

Martin Luther
Reform is a critical theme within the Reformation Period. Reform can be defined as to correct, to improve, and to make changes. Such historical restructure could not have survived without Martin Luther, a leader with empowering use of logos and personal virtue of integrity. Many of us can learn from Martin Luther to spark reform within our own lives and leadership.

Monday, November 26, 2018

A Malleable Audience

To see what an impactful orator was Winston Churchill, one need only look at the fact there is an award-winning film, The Darkest Hour, that centers around his ability as a speaker. Phrases from his iconic speeches remain in the minds of even the least historically attuned. One speech that stands out is the "Sinews of Peace" speech he gave at the start of the Cold War. For better or worse, it was powerful, and its message spread worldwide.

Winston Churchill delivering his "Sinews of Peace,"
aka "Iron Curtain," speech at Westminster College
in front of an attentive audience.
An essential part of Churchill's speech is kairos. The former prime minister delivered it at Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri, to as large an audience as would fit in the gymnasium, with President Harry Truman beside him. He knew he had an intelligent, attentive audience that included US officials with power to influence change.

Almost the first half of the speech is written to connect the orator to his audience. He starts off with some rather effective humor, and by linking himself to the president, he cements his authority as a speaker to an American congregation. In the first half of the speech, Churchill makes increasingly bold claims followed by statements recognizing that he and the audience are in agreement (also made apparent by the audience's applause). By the halfway point, there is an evident connection between Churchill and his listeners.

Once Churchill builds a rapport with his audience, he gradually uses that trust to ask them to consider an idea of his: unifying the United States and the British Commonwealth. He leans heavily on both logos and pathos for this. He calls the people to action against fears that most were all too familiar with ("the two great dangers which menace the home of the people, War and Tyranny"), and lists specific ways in which unifying would be logical and beneficial ("This would perhaps double the mobility of the American Navy and Air Force."). I can imagine those calls would be particularly powerful to citizens of a country that had just been through a heart-wrenching war and continued to live in fear of looming catastrophic bombs.

Churchill frequently uses repetition, congeries, and alliteration to drive home his points, and his delivery makes them even more stirring ("For them is all distorted, all is broken, all is even ground to pulp."). It's difficult not to connect with language that is crafted in such a way as Churchill sculpted his.

Image

All in Balance

Winston Churchill is indisputably one of the greatest orators of all time. His speeches rallied nations, his voice was a constant during Europe's most terrifying conflict. He became a trusted force for justice and freedom in the world, and was regarded as such long after his term as Prime Minister had concluded. It was in this attitude that he delivered his speech, "The Sinews of Peace" only 8 months after WWII had ended. What impressed me so much about this address was the balance between all three persuasive appeals. Churchill employed them effortlessly, creating an airtight argument for his view of the world condition at the time.

He begins with a brief appeal to pathos, marking the short time since the war had passed before engaging in a thorough and well organized logical analysis of the state of world affairs. He speaks of the necessity of the world organization in guarding against war and tyranny. He states that the world needs a global armed force. He describes the situation in Eastern Europe dispassionately, stating facts with little to no leaning into pathos. He saves that.

Delicately, he implies that the success of the UNO depends on the success and influence of the U.S.'s treaties outside that order, appealing to his relationship to the country as the leader of it's former ally. He calls upon the U.S., as the foremost world power, to lead the world in freedom and liberty. He disavows his interest and ambition in world affairs saying, "any private ambitions I may have cherished in my younger days have been satisfied beyond my wildest dreams". He thus presents himself as an old and cherished friend, arrived to lend some advice near and dear to his heart.

And so, with logos and ethos carefully balanced, Churchill delivers his most poignant blow- War is not inevitable. It can be prevented. It could have been prevented if they'd listened to him before the last war. Hopefully, they'll listen to him now, and take his advice.

It's a brilliant construction to a cogent point. Only with the solid support of his relationship to the nation to whom he was speaking and the factual backing of the situation in Europe could he make the appeal for them to listen to him, or risk the end of the world as we know it.