Winston Churchill delivering his "Sinews of Peace," aka "Iron Curtain," speech at Westminster College in front of an attentive audience. |
Almost the first half of the speech is written to connect the orator to his audience. He starts off with some rather effective humor, and by linking himself to the president, he cements his authority as a speaker to an American congregation. In the first half of the speech, Churchill makes increasingly bold claims followed by statements recognizing that he and the audience are in agreement (also made apparent by the audience's applause). By the halfway point, there is an evident connection between Churchill and his listeners.
Once Churchill builds a rapport with his audience, he gradually uses that trust to ask them to consider an idea of his: unifying the United States and the British Commonwealth. He leans heavily on both logos and pathos for this. He calls the people to action against fears that most were all too familiar with ("the two great dangers which menace the home of the people, War and Tyranny"), and lists specific ways in which unifying would be logical and beneficial ("This would perhaps double the mobility of the American Navy and Air Force."). I can imagine those calls would be particularly powerful to citizens of a country that had just been through a heart-wrenching war and continued to live in fear of looming catastrophic bombs.
Churchill frequently uses repetition, congeries, and alliteration to drive home his points, and his delivery makes them even more stirring ("For them is all distorted, all is broken, all is even ground to pulp."). It's difficult not to connect with language that is crafted in such a way as Churchill sculpted his.
Image
I really like the connection you saw between the listeners and Churchill. I think it is definitely true that he relied on the intelligence of his audience in order to make the claims and suggestions that he did. I also find interesting the power that came from having the President there. I'm sure they had many one-on-one discussions, but it must have been very different for the President to hear Churchill express his ideas to the American people directly.
ReplyDeleteI also noticed how much Churchill played on their fears. He called up scenes of "great danger" and "indefinite expansion" of the soviet power. That pathos gave him the lever to call for action at the present moment. I think that building that emotional connection like you said was critical to that
ReplyDeleteGreat insight by tying in the Darkest Hour’s portrayal of Churchill's character. I believe that after Churchill lead Britain to victory, he was awarded a level of respect and authority around the world, especially among his allies. This strengthened his call to action.
ReplyDelete