Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Come One, Come All!

Dear Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, 

I am writing concerning your stance on immigration and I hope that you’ll take some time to consider my thoughts. My dad is an economist for Brigham Young University, and he has done extensive research on how migration affects the economy. His research has concluded that movement is good for the economy. It allows people to move to where they can be most productive. Which helps both them and the economies they work for. Many immigrants are seeking refuge from their homelands. The governments they flee from don’t give them basic human rights, the rights that were written into our constitution by founders seeking refuge from the unfair treatment of King George. Our country was started by European settlers seeking new land. The United States of America wouldn’t be what it is today, if there weren’t those initial immigrants who left their homeland in search of a better life.


                      
                             

When Christopher Columbus who “discovered” America, Sir Francis Drake, the second man to circumnavigate the earth, Ferdinand Magellan, attempted to circumnavigate the earth but died before his crew finished the journey, and so many more men in the 14th to 17th centuries the world was completely open to anyone and everyone who could afford a ship that would take them to wherever they wanted to go. They were admired for it; they were put in the history books for it. They were honored for discovering brave new worlds. During the Trump administration, a foreigner’s chance of getting into our country legally have been very low. The new ceiling of only 18,000 immigrants a year makes these chances even lower. 18,000 is less than the student body of my school. During the Carter administration the ceiling was set at 95,000.

At BYU, I have learned about enlightenment values, including toleration, human rights, and progress. The most recent act that you helped President Trump pass doesn’t fit into any of these categories. Keeping refugees out of our countries feels intolerant and prevents the downtrodden from living in a place where human rights are respected. The progress is stunted as well because during the Carter Administration, the United States accepted 5.3 times more than we will in the next fiscal year. When one thinks of the Enlightenment it makes them want to be more. To be better, yet we are doing the opposite. 
                    
                         Image result for refugees

I have recently learned about culture at scale and globalism. Globalism is good for the world. Migration helps drive globalism, bringing new ideas and methods from all over the world to our reach. Globalism is beneficial to help the world progress. Each new person coming into our country can show us a better way to do something and help us improve as a country.

I believe that by helping others we are only helping ourselves. According to the New Yorker, “Accepting large numbers of refugees has improved the United States’ standing with foreign allies, and it has helped the military and intelligence communities find partners in conflict zones.” Letting in people from countries that are struggling gives us allies when we need them. Shutting people out hurts us as well as those we block. I believe that raising the immigration cap back to 50,000 migrants per fiscal year will improve your popularity with the American people and make our country a much better place. 



Sincerely,
Christina Bradford

2 comments:

  1. I fully support this cause and I also hope that immigration caps get raised. At the beginning of your post you were indirectly referencing the ad fontes movement of looking back to our past to inform our future. This could be an even more powerful part of the argument by continuing talking about this thread as you bring in the experiences of Columbus and others. I personally would have also liked to see an anecdote of an individual that is representative of immigrants or refugees. Sometimes things in the purely abstract lack emotional power. For me personally being married to my wife who is an immigrant from Thailand and going through the process has made this a very personal and relevant issue for me. Knowing the story of an immigrant as an individual can help you see that their story is our story and that immigration really is the fountain that we look back to for our own formation as a nation. My only other piece of feedback is a couple formatting issues. The fonts change size/style in paragraph two and the opening sentence of the same paragraph is an ungrammatical run on that undermines clarity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One of the main ways this blog post can be strengthened would be to explain globalism and culture at scale a bit more in depth. I think this is your strongest argument and it could be even stronger if you described some of the specific benefits of globalization in general, and the specific reasons that bringing in more immigrants helps the United States. I like the image of the migrant boy. It could enhance your argument to label the image and perhaps include a brief description of who he is and what his story is. That could assist in making appeals to emotion as well. I also think your reference to brave new worlds goes with your argument perfectly. It could also help to note some of the reasons these people explored the world such as religion, trade routes, power, etc. and how those reasons compare to migrants reasons for exploration today. Also, from an organizational perspective, I think it could help to break up your first paragraph, into the economic part and the part explaining why migrants leave their homelands. Overall, solid argument and I really appreciate what you had to say.

    ReplyDelete