 |
| A sample from the ink blot test. |
I’ve decided that I want to talk about erroneous perceptions of psychology (as I brought up in my
previous post about hot spots in psychology). There are a lot of things that the public thinks about psychology that, while catchy and interesting, aren’t important to the practice of psychology today. One example might be Rorschach ink blot tests. This test was created by a psychologist to see if individuals with schizophrenia would view things differently than a person without schizophrenia. It has now entered the public sphere as something we use to tell us interesting things about people’s personalities, but they are totally invalid and unreliable tests. I feel like when we take things like this out of context, or attempt to boil a complicated issue like personality into a small number of discrete types, we turn psychology into something close to astrology.
I hope to talk about why it is important that we try harder as a society to understand the nuances of topics within psychology because the more we know about psychology the more useful it can be. I think about how much stigma was associated with mental health treatments in the 50s and 60s, how people who went to see a psychologist were “crazy” or you can even watch episodes of Cheers (a show from the 1980s) and listen to them talk about sending Diane to the “loony-bin”. Today I think we are much better about helping people with mental health issues, but I think that as the public continues to really understand things about psychology rather than just picking out interesting tidbits we can see psychology more like a science and less like a mystical art, and people will be better able to use it to get better.