From printing words on a paper to 3D Design and printing, we've come a very long way. |
1. [Policy Claim]
Instead of being viewed as major-only classes, courses based in computer science and computational thinking should be General Education requirements for all college majors, because it helps students develop a new problem solving process that can be applied to any field.
2. [Causal Claim]
Computational thinking, and therefore computer science, is quite relevant to the study of history, because it is a direct product of the predominant ideas of historical ages such as the enlightenment and industrialization.
3. [Comparison Claim]
Computational thinking is very similar to “critical thinking” as taught in liberal arts classes, since both types of thinking can be applied to a broad range of subjects and situations.
4. [Evaluation Claim]
The current social attitude towards computational thinking and computer science is both negative and limited in scope. This prevents society from reaping the general benefits of this perspective of problem solving.
5. [Definition Claim]
Computational thinking has developed throughout history and goes as far back as the printing press and further into history. The development of this mode of thought parallels the development of Mankind.
Generating claims in these different forms has helped me try to look at computational from several different angles. Writings several sentences that identify something significant about computational thinking has also helped me try and develop a sense of what really matters in this discussion. I am no longer just studying interesting facts about computational thinking, I am trying to determine the real impact it has had on mankind as the world has been developed. I'm really excited to keep looking into this, and I hope to have these claims developed further soon.
I think many aspects of computational thinking can be helpful tools to enhance a person's problem solving capacity. One thing I am a little confused about is the comparison with "critical thinking." I think the "input to output" mode of thought runs the risk of excessively simplifying things that are subjective in nature. That being said, I certainly value the modes of thought I gained from my computer science classes.
ReplyDeleteI'd love to hear a little more about your evaluation claim. I think my first instinct is to disagree with that claim but I can definitely see the reasoning behind it if I think about it. I also love that you brought up the printing press because without that I wonder if we would even have any kind of educational system at all.
ReplyDelete