Monday, September 17, 2018

Looking Past the Mark

In Castiglione's book on The Cortier, Pietro Bembo takes a classic rhetorical approach to portray love and beauty as divine qualities, distinct from the body. The most fundamental tools he uses to display his argument is definition and division. Pietro says he will "make it clear" exactly what love is, and how we experience it. He goes on to divide our perception and understanding of the world into the senses, rational thought and intellect. He defines love as an ardent desire for beauty,  which cannot be satisfied by sensual love, but by cherishing your partner, serving them, and rationally enjoying their divine beauty. While Pietro is correct that beauty cannot be enjoyed through sensual desires, he misses the mark of the true reasons behind love.


Portrait of a Young Man- Bronzino (1530's)
Beauty and love cannot only be enjoyed through rational thought and intellect. In Bronzinos' Portrait of a Young Man renaissance thinkers humanist ideas can be seen. As n Haughtan points out in her thesis, "Portrait of a Young Man not only depicts his subject's idealized appearance but also his scholarship, background and potential. " The book cracked in his right hand suggests that reading was so normal that he would have been caught in the act, not wanting to stop when the painter came. Bronzino does not simply add the book as an afterthought, but the ornate background furniture, and the book as a symbol of knowledge, class, and wealth at the time add to the viewers concept of beauty. This idea however falls as flat as the painting itself. To love only through looking or listening to someones thoughts and ideas is as futile as trying to understand the Young mans true character by simply looking at the painting. 

Pietro concedes that a kiss may be appropriate at certain times because the rational lover can mingle his soul with that of his lover. He contends that beauty is supernatural, and loses its nobility when fused with our bodies, but what he doesn't realize, is that by expressing our natural desires in love, we take part in the supernatural and divine. What Pietro thinks of as only sensual and evil, is a part of and a symbol of the divine creation of all mankind. The mingling of souls in a kiss is amplified and completed as are dedicated to each other, and become like the Ultimate Creator. While beauty is divine, and cannot be only fulfilled in the body, trying to exclude all physicality from love is looking past the mark of what love is.

Bronzino - Portrait of a Young Man, (1530's)- public domain

Haughton, Neil. “Perceptions of Beauty in Renaissance Art.” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, vol. 3, no. 4, 2004, pp. 229–233., doi:10.1111/j.1473-2130.2004.00142.x.

4 comments:

  1. I found this to be an interesting post bout love. I think this is an interesting time as romanticized love begins to really take form in the arts and writings. Different artists and authors have different takes on the meaning of love, such as Shakespeare compared to the example you provide above of Pietro.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you that love is to be experienced by more than our intellect; in fact, I believe that love strongly represents the instinctive and the irrational. However, do consider that Bembo's writings were written at the recent dusk of the strongly Christian and chaste Middle Ages. His attitude towards physical affection seems fitting, historically.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I definitely think that Pietro was looking past the mark and that the rigidity of religious observance of the time might have influenced how many people viewed love. Love, in my opinion, requires one's whole self to truly experience: body, soul, and mind. It is unfair of Pietro to assert that his method of experiencing love is the absolute correct way and you do a great job of pointing that out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that lots of people today still "see past the mark" regarding love in a variety of ways. Love is such a complex, abstract thing that it's hard to try and understand it from any one point of view. It's also interesting to see how some ideas have managed to exist for centuries, sometimes changing, without any signs of stopping.

    ReplyDelete