A recent rule requires auditing
firms to include signatures of the audit engagement partners and names of other
involved firms on the auditing report.
It’s been met with some resistance since the name of the firm carries a
reputation with it which could enhance or decrease the credibility in the audit
report and/or financial statements that investors read. (See https://www.accountingweb.com/aa/auditing/pcaob-adopts-new-rules-on-naming-audit-engagement-partner)
Responsibility Accounting: Good or Bad?
Responsibility
accounting is a networking system that businesses use to delegate assignments
to managers in subsystems to make goals and be held accountable for specific costs
and revenues. Some advocate this method
because it allows specialization, more accountability on the manager, more
motivation, etc. Others argue that this method
“promotes subsystem optimization” and therefore prevents “inter-functional
cooperation.” (See number 6 in https://maaw.info/ArticleSummaries/ArtSumMartin94.htm)
Earnings Management vs. Earnings Manipulation
Many
decisions are based on the reported accounting numbers, including whether or
not an investor decides to invest in the company. Therefore, managers have various motivations
and incentive to manage the earnings reported on the financial statements. Some of the financial accounting is left to
the say of the accountant, which allows for earnings management. However, there’s a difference between
earnings management and earnings manipulation—that is, ethical strategic timing
versus fraud. But where do you draw the
line? (See https://smallbusiness.chron.com/ethical-issues-facing-accounting-profession-18307.html)
I’m most opinionated about this third topic. Accounting is the “language of business”
which makes the financial statements a sort of medium not only for internal
purposes but it serves as a link between the company and investors. A lot depends on the numbers reported, so I
see where the motive comes to manage the numbers to the company’s benefit. However, I value integrity more than these other
incentives, and I think accountants can be strategic in their reporting without
being deceptive.
I would also think your third topic is the most interesting. Mostly because I want to hear an informed opinion on it. You would have more than enough historical examples as well. It would be interesting to see if there were a couple of cases where the biggest difference was timing and how much of an influence that had on an ethical verdict.
ReplyDeleteI think that because Accounting is the language of business, it would be interesting to see how rhetorical strategy could be applied to it. I feel like structuring an argument is very similar making a mathematical proof and could be applied to Accounting as well.
ReplyDelete