Reading these letters to Cicero, the theme of the Renaissance is very present. It is most clear, however, when one has background information on Cicero’s life. He was, as Petrarch applauds, a gifted philosopher. On top of that, however, he was a powerful statesman. He fought passionately for the Republic, and sometimes took questionable measures in order to achieve his goal, not always successfully.
What I find interesting about Petrarch’s approach to Cicero’s character in his letters is how fascinated Petrarch is by the language and prose. It seems that Petrarch latches onto Cicero’s philosophical aspects, begging him to cultivate only those talents, while not dimply disregarding, but even condemning his efforts as a statesman. This is the epitome of Renaissance thinking as it applies to antiquity. It is the obsession with the language, with that new old way to present thoughts more eloquently than Italians had been in recent years. Petrarch cared very little for the politics of Ancient Rome, his heart and mind more occupied by higher words leading to higher thoughts.
The evolution of language is definitely interesting- you mentioned 'that new old way to present thoughts more eloquently than Italians had been in recent years'. It's certainly clear that language has been taking a nose dive recently, and I wonder if there will be an effort to dust off the English language and use it as thoughtfully as they have in past centuries.
ReplyDeleteI think the way languages change is an interesting point to bring up. It makes me think of the way Shakespeare added dozens of words to the English language. We often add words to our language based on our cultures and need to express ourselves better.
ReplyDeleteThe last line of your article reminded me of Plato's forms, which makes me think.. How useful is language for accessing and more importantly, expressing, higher thoughts? Do deeper paths of thought require verbal or written expression in order to clarify them?
ReplyDelete