Photo by Syd Wachs on Unsplash |
However, by 1555, this attitude towards the arts dramatically shifted. Luther’s successor of Protestant thought, John Calvin, “allowed no art other than music, and even that could not involve instruments.” In his religious stronghold of Geneva, Switzerland, Calvin punished those who did not conform to this rule (and others) by death or banishment. Calvin seemed to separate literature from his definition of art, however, because he himself was the author of copious amounts of prose and many poems. Even the straight-laced Calvin realized the power of words, literature, and rhetoric to educate his audience about sacred things.
The Literature Legacy of Reformation Ideals
Today, in 2019, I am working towards becoming a middle-school English teacher. This past spring, I had the chance to work directly with a teacher who shares Luther's and Calvin's views on literature's importance. She used a collection of books, including Angie Thomas' The Hate U Give and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, to springboard a discussion about what she called "world on fire" topics. Her students discussed challenges that they and their peers faced daily—hunger, puberty, social struggles, bad family situations, and more—and used the characters from their literature to propose solutions. These students were benefited by their teacher's recognition that language has power to train minds "for the apt understanding . . . of sacred things" pertaining to the human experience. Through the efforts of educators across the globe, the legacy of the Reformation's value of literary art lives on.
No comments:
Post a Comment