What I learned is that change in communication modes on a large scale can be hard for members of the general populace to accept, even when there are clear benefits to the new mode. There are almost certainly drawbacks to each, but I suggest that the benefits outweigh the costs.
Printed in the same resource as “The Press,” the page before refers to “aggressive humanists” who were looking to sway public opinion by way of public speaking. It is possible that part of their animosity toward print in general was out of fear of being replaced as skilled communicators. That certainly shows up in “When People Feared Computers.” Those mathematicians who held positions as “computers” at various companies did in fact lose those jobs to computers of the mechanical variety. In the Renaissance, I suspect that the fear was that oratory in general would be replaced, or that the “vulgar” populace would corrupt the art.
“Computerphobes” as defined here are few and far between. More common are those who sympathize with TS Eliot when he wrote, “Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?” My experience has been that most professions have been enhanced by the memorizing and processing ability of computers. Businesses thrive on the data shared between companies. Jobs appear for people who can manage and interpret that data. Technicians, software specialists, and even linguists are required to build, maintain, and communicate with our hyper-fast new “books.” As the medium of communication improves, so does the efficiency with which we conduct everyday life. I believe that it is up to us as people to ensure that, in a world of data quantity, we preserve as much of the wisdom quantity that we can find throughout humanity’s rich history.
This is true. I feel like I see it more and more book smart people who aren't street smart. How would you suggest to fix the issue?
ReplyDeleteOne of the biggest things that sets people who aren't "street smart" is inexperience. I found a post that was quite interesting: Book Smart vs. Street Smart. (https://scottberkun.com/2010/book-smarts-vs-street-smarts/) I believe if we can find a way to immerse people to the world around them, if they have the aptitude, they will gain the ability read the situation around them.
DeleteThis is so interesting-- I like how you're suggesting that when new waves of gathering/computing information come about, the old skills that had been replaced don't just stop existing. Data analysis skills, communication skills, and understanding of how to collect and compute data is still important and still plays a role. Technology hasn't eradicated human involvement, it just modifies the job.
ReplyDelete